Grounding Lexical Meaning in Core Cognition
نویسنده
چکیده
Author’s note: This document is a slightly updated and reformatted extract from a grant proposal to the ONR. As a proposal, it aims describe useful directions while reviewing existing and pilot work; it has no pretensions to being a systematic, rigorous, or entirely coherent scholarly work. On the other hand, I’ve found that it provides a useful overview of a few ideas on the architecture of natural language that haven’t yet appeared elsewhere. I provide it for those interested, but with all due caveats. Words are potentially one of the clearest windows on human knowledge and conceptual structure. But what do words mean? In this project we aim to construct and explore a formal model of lexical semantics grounded, via pragmatic inference, in core conceptual structures. Flexible human cognition is derived in large part from our ability to imagine possible worlds. A rich set of concepts, intuitive theories, and other mental representations support imagining and reasoning about possible worlds—together we call these core cognition. Here we posit that the collection of core concepts also forms the set of primitive elements available for lexical semantics: word meanings are built from pieces of core cognition. We propose to study lexical semantics in the setting of an architecture for language understanding that integrates literal meaning with pragmatic inference. This architecture supports underspecified and uncertain lexical meaning, leading to subtle interactions between meaning, conceptual structure, and context. We will explore several cases of lexical semantics where these interactions are particularly important: indexicals, scalar adjectives, generics, and modals. We formalize both core cognition and the natural language architecture using the Church probabilistic programming language. In this project we aim to contribute to our understanding of the connection between words and mental representations; from this we expect to gain critical insights into many aspects of psychology, to construct vastly more useful thinking machines, and to interface natural and artificial intelligences more efficiently.
منابع مشابه
The Semantics of Shapes: A Study based on Mandarin
Mandarin shape nouns, such as afanglxing2 'square' and sanljiao3xing2 'triangle', share a set of very interesting lexical semantic features. These nouns can refer to either the contour (i.e. the outside edge) or enclosed area of the shape. In this paper, we will try to explain this lexical semantic fact both in terms of the cognitive theory of grounding and the visualization. Our study will be ...
متن کاملPredicting the Good Guy and the Bad Guy: Attitudes are Encoded in Language Statistics
Various studies have provided evidence that people activate introspective simulations when making valence judgments. Such evidence is in line with an embodied cognition account that argues that cognition is fundamentally embodied, with perceptual simulation rather than language statistics being the source of lexical semantics. Recently, demonstrations that conceptual knowledge is encoded in lan...
متن کاملSymbol Grounding Revisited 1 the Origin of Symbol Grounding 1.1 Overview 1.2 the Symbol Grounding Problem
Symbol Grounding has originated in the domain of cognitive connectionism as an approach to a model of language acquisition.It has, however, transcended this restricted domain and its most prominent proponents now regard it as a technique which is of general importance to the connectionist-symbolic debate, especially for their integration into a common framework. This paper revisits the claims m...
متن کاملCross-Modal Grounding of Meaning
The current study investigates how the speaker grounds meaning for a referent by gestural repetition along with speech in daily conversation. The domain of analysis is the stretch of talk that encompasses the beginning and the end of the joint action during which a pair of similar gestures is produced by different speakers across turns to depict the same referent. A particular cross-modal groun...
متن کاملLexical Cohesion and Literariness in Malcolm X's " The Ballot or the Bullet"
This paper unearths the contribution of lexical cohesion to the textuality and overall meaning of Malcolm X’s speech 'The Ballot or the Bullet'. Drawing on Halliday and Hasan’s (1976) and Hoey’s (1991) theory of cohesion, specifically lexical cohesion, whose main thrust is the role of lexical items in not only contributing to meaning but also serving as cohesive ties, the paper discusses how ...
متن کامل